2026 buyer’s guide is in researchSee how profiles are verified

Public research standard

How We Research and Rank HVAC Software

Evidence status is visible, scores require every criterion and paid relationships never buy a ranking position.

Three evidence levels

Vendor-source research

We review vendor-owned product, pricing, help and policy pages. We can describe positioning and published capabilities, but we do not call this hands-on testing.

Hands-on tested

We access the product and run documented HVAC scenarios. A test date, plan and limitations are recorded. A demo watched by an editor is not equivalent to independent account access.

Customer-verified

A current operator independently corroborates a workflow, cost or limitation. We record the business context and verification date without exposing private company information.

The 100-point HVAC rubric

A numerical score is published only when all criteria have evidence. The database derives the overall /10 score from the criterion total; editors cannot type an unrelated overall rating.

CriterionMaximumWhat it measures
Dispatch20 pointsVisibility, reassignment, skill matching and urgent-call handling.
Scheduling15 pointsRecurring visits, capacity, installation work and conflict control.
Mobile field workflow15 pointsTechnician speed, context, forms, photos, signatures and reliability.
Estimating and invoicing15 pointsPricebook, proposals, approvals, financing, invoices and payments.
Reporting10 pointsOperational, sales and profitability reporting with usable definitions.
Integrations and data access10 pointsAccounting, phones, payments, exports, API and data ownership.
Ease of use and onboarding10 pointsSetup, training, daily usability and administration burden.
Support and reliability5 pointsSupport access, reliability communication and issue resolution.

Pricing research

We preserve the vendor URL and check date. Public entry pricing is labeled as such; custom quotes are not converted into invented estimates. Buyers should confirm billing frequency, included users, setup, add-ons, payments and contract terms in writing.

Update and correction policy

  • High-intent pricing and comparison pages are reviewed more frequently than evergreen guides.
  • Material corrections include a new verification date and source.
  • Vendors may submit factual corrections, but cannot approve editorial conclusions.
  • A profile can remain unscored when evidence is incomplete.

Commercial policy

There are no paid ranking positions. Future affiliate relationships, sponsorships or common ownership will be disclosed on the affected page and in the site disclosure. Commercial compensation cannot change the rubric.

Find a guide or software profile